Christianity or capitulation
"Taking the jab is the Christian duty of loving your neighbor."
"Forgiving student loans is the Christian duty of forgiving debt."
"Raising taxes to provide for pregnant women, maternal care, and early childhood 'education' is a pro-life Christian duty."
What these bright policy ideas have in common is that they represent a turn away from personal responsibility and towards the state as an ideological entity capable of solving all ills, and they leverage faith in Christ to achieve it. Their proponents opportunistically use the good will of Christians to inflict serious harm on our already reeling polity.
Not coincidentally, each of these political notions masquerading as religious precepts promotes socialism, the doctrine that the state, and only the state, can administer to its citizens the actions it has deemed appropriate, and whom it regards as fair game for its ambitions.
I say "administer" because each requires a bureaucratic structure which will, once established, be impervious to recourse from the citizens it inflicts its designs upon. When the inevitable inequities arise from the very remedy sought, no normal political process, among the many we are the increasingly ungrateful inheritors of, will be effective in undoing the damage or removing those to whom power was imprudently given.
The state ought to insure freedom, in justice, for good people to act -- for the good. The state's role is to preserve the common good (those immaterial goods not owned by anyone nor attainable by any one person, but shared by all) and to defend the innocent from evil.
When a free people give the state permission to override bodily integrity, private property, and marital bonds, they will soon find that they are no longer free.