My thinking about vaccines has changed over the years as I have had more experience and noted changes in how the medical world treats them. As the number and sorts of shots (each unique, by the way; it’s a mistake to lump them all together) have increased and doctors’ autonomy has decreased, my skepticism has grown.
With my own children I was selective. I never agreed to the Hep-B shot and certainly not Gardasil.
And I totally stand by consulting one’s common sense and intuition when it comes to injecting substances into healthy people, especially children, especially infants.
In the 90s I became aware of the use of aborted fetal tissue in the development and manufacture of the chicken pox vaccine and was determined not to be complicit in that situation.
But the very existence of such a thing was a red flag: chicken pox is a relatively benign childhood disease. Why develop a vaccine for it? Unless it’s just that women can’t leave work for the three weeks each child is mildly sick… a big price to pay, morally speaking, for a social trend that doesn’t tend to the flourishing of the health of our children or our society, but that’s another conversation.
Anyway, over time I’ve seen these threads come together. With lockdown, it was clear to me that whatever the original model for vaccines was, it has now become a reckless mass experiment, combining state control of information (outright and also using the social tool of self-silencing) with elite complicity in outright propaganda, not to mention the drug companies’ immunity from liability.
A demonstration of this dynamic is the impossibility of asking whether there is a causal connection between the many shots a child receives in infancy and the exponential increase in autism.
I have long thought that the polarization of the question has to do with that charged word, autism.
If instead we asked “do the shots track with an increase in both temporary and persistent neurological damage,” then the answer is undeniably yes. Children’s hospitals treat, keep records, and make reports of just such sorts of vaccine harm presenting in their wards on a monthly basis. They get money from the taxpayer (you) to mitigate the damage — there is a fund set up for this purpose.
I encourage you to watch this clip from an interview Tucker Carlson did with Steve Kirsch, who is a numbers-cruncher MIT guy who I guess has made enough money that he doesn’t mind telling the truth. Kirsch is not going to lose his medical practice or face the loss of any license if he says what everyone involved — except parents! — knows. (The whole interview is amazing, but it’s now behind a paywall —I saw part of it on youtube before it disappeared).
Carlson quickly jumped in: “May I? May I ask you to pause that? I mean, the statement you just made is verboten. I mean, no person who wanted to say work at the Atlantic magazine or who takes the New York Times on a daily basis would ever say something like that because you’re not allowed to say that. Tell us why you say that?”
Kirsch responded: “Because it’s true. I’ve collected my own data just independently to look at the connection between vaccines and autism. And it’s amazing. I had over 10,000 parents, tell me about their kids. And I said, hey, tell me about your kids. Tell me how many vaccines they got, and tell me if they have autism. Tell me if they have ADHD. You know, just tell me about your kids. Tell me about the medical conditions. And tell me about how many shots they get. And it’s a straight line. The more shots you get, the more likely you are to get autism. And it’s the same thing for ADHD. It’s the same thing for PANDAS. It’s the same thing for autoimmune diseases. I mean that it is basically the more shots you get, the less healthy the kids are.”
I implore parents to look up each and every shot (intervention) before agreeing to its use on their child. It’s not true that vaccines have always been mandated, as I wrote here. Go here for information found on the inserts for the shots — look up the shots your child would be getting. Go here for whether the shot is ethical (i.e. uses aborted baby cells in its development and/or manufacture). Bodily integrity is a human right! Parents secure this right for their children.
I hope Steve Kirsch’s open statement of the truth will embolden you!
Appreciate you taking this on. Since I’ve been following your writing on LMLD and here your perspective has changed and I just want to say I really respect your intellectual honesty.
As an aside, I find myself wondering regularly about the natural law consequences of vaccinations (and other medical abominations) on those who are not complicit in the evil and likely don’t even know about it. If you haven’t seen the Plotkin deposition someone took some time to go through the more then 9 hours of footage and pull short clips. This is him admitting that babies, orphans and the mentally handicapped were used for research … https://youtu.be/Ms_FbdWq2G4?si=yfnA_3AjpwC4UqMf … a few years ago there was a clip from the deposition where he admitted something like 72 aborted (still living) babies were used in one study for a vaccine. I can’t find it now, but that’s a shabby mess of a foundation that’s going to have some serious consequences.
I would like to see a study done on the prevalence of autism in non vaccinated children.
Thank you for this post - it is brave and absolutely critical because parents are making decisions about their child’s healthcare and if something happens to their child, the parent needs to be able or stand before their child and justify why they did or didn’t do something.
The very fact that this kind of discussion is largely prohibited, along with hidden coercion pushing vaccines (in australia there are financial and educational penalties if your child is not fully vaxxed) and the immunity given to vax companies should make anyone discerning this issue pause.