Vaccine questions, claims, and resources

Updated occasionally -- bookmark and come back

I’ve been collecting some vaccine info and just want to put it all in one place.

Maybe you’d be interested in some of these resources too.

I will probably update this post as we go along, so be sure to save it.

Claim: Studies show vaccines are safe.

What do the inserts of the shots say about their safety?

RFK Jr on vaccine safety (among other things, he discusses inserts and how they must include risks and do not just represent a catch-all to cover all the bases)

NIH Concedes It Has No Studies Assessing The Safety Of Injecting Aluminum Adjuvants

Remember This When "Experts" Claim a "Salt Water" Placebo Was Used in the First Polio and Other Vaccine Trials

Combination Routine Childhood Vaccination Associated with Development of Asthma and Eczema

UPDATE 2/20/25: From @kacdnp91 on X (Kelly Cardiology/Functional/Integrative Medicine): “In case you’re still debating whether or not to vaccinate your baby/child know this; NONE of the 💉have been tested for carcinogenicity or impaired fertility. Ever….See 13.1 [highlighted in the image] on all inserts.” [Note — this information is in the insert provided by the manufacturer]

Claim: Vaccines don’t cause autism.

A new large-scale, peer-reviewed study of nearly 50,000 children links vaccination with significant risk of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism

International scientists have found autism's cause. What will Americans do?

Unsafe at Any Speed: Dr. Toby Rogers on DarkHorse Is autism genetic? Is the diagnosis more sensitive? What are the economics of autism?

Sen. Cassidy Told RFK Jr. This Study Proves Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism — Here’s What’s Wrong With the Study

California's Autism Increase Not Due To Better Counting, Diagnosis

History of Public Health/Vaccinations

Infectious Disease, Antibiotics, and Vaccination — charts showing when the diseases abated and when the shots were introduced

Boston: Smallpox Vaccination An Unmitigated Failure

Claim: The “Vatican” says it’s moral to use vaccines derived from aborted fetal tissue

Here is Fr. Michael Copenhagen on the subject of clarifying conscience: a speech and an essay, well worth your time.

This is the document you actually want to read when people make this claim, but you have to read the whole thing:

Moral Reflections On Vaccines Prepared From Cells Derived From Aborted Human Foetuses (scroll way down to the relevant section, “Application to the use of vaccines prepared from cells coming from embryos or foetuses aborted voluntarily”

• there is a grave responsibility to use alternative vaccines and to make a conscientious objection with regard to those which have moral problems…

• such cooperation occurs in a context of moral coercion of the conscience of parents, who are forced to choose to act against their conscience or otherwise, to put the health of their children and of the population as a whole at risk. This is an unjust alternative choice, which must be eliminated as soon as possible.

Note the lack of insistence on using these products and the strong (“grave”) injunction to avoid and protest them. Ask any doctor who urges you to use the shots against your conscience if he has fulfilled the obligation imposed by this document:

“Therefore, doctors and fathers of families have a duty to take recourse to alternative vaccines13 (if they exist), putting pressure on the political authorities and health systems so that other vaccines without moral problems become available. They should take recourse, if necessary, to the use of conscientious objection14 with regard to the use of vaccines produced by means of cell lines of aborted human foetal origin. Equally, they should oppose by all means (in writing, through the various associations, mass media, etc.) the vaccines which do not yet have morally acceptable alternatives, creating pressure so that alternative vaccines are prepared, which are not connected with the abortion of a human foetus, and requesting rigorous legal control of the pharmaceutical industry producers…

In any case, there remains a moral duty to continue to fight and to employ every lawful means in order to make life difficult for the pharmaceutical industries which act unscrupulously and unethically.”

Are mandates moral? The teaching of the Church

or maybe: